Two recent studies remind me that frequent and early screening mammograms may not always (emphasis on “not always”) be a good idea.  The first study in JAMA looked at women who received chest radiation as a child and found that only about half of the women had a screening mammogram within the past two years – despite evidence that their exposure to radiation as a child may increase their risk of breast cancer. The article’s headline seemed to suggest that women with such a risky history were in some way negligent when in fact they (or their doctors) may have been appropriately cautious about doing too many x-rays.  An accompanying editorial wisely suggested in my opinion that maybe women with childhood radiation should have less exposure to x-rays rather than more exposure. The editorial raised the question whether perhaps breast MRI’s would be a better way to screen high risk women with a history of childhood radiation to avoid unnecessary and potentially risky x-ray exposure. 

The second study questioned whether the current recommendations for women who have inherited one of the two known breast cancer genes BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 to begin screening mammograms at age 25 or 30 makes good sense. Researchers looked at a mathematical model calculating radiation exposure in young women receiving regular mammograms and compared this potential risk to increase breast cancer from x-rays to the potential benefit of starting mammograms at a young age. Their model suggested the increased risk of breast cancer from exposure to the radiation by doing the x-rays may outweigh any benefit of screening for young women at high risk for cancer because they have inherited one of the breast cancer genes, BRCA 1 or 2. These studies take me back to the early 1980’s when the controversy around the benefits versus the risks of mammograms took center stage in the screening debate.  

The argument against mammograms back then was as follows: since mammograms require exposure to ionizing radiation, a known risk factor for breast cancer, why would you expose a woman’s breast to this radiation year after year with only marginal hope that a cancer will be detected early enough to improve outcome?  Some scientists felt at the time that the risk of cancer related to radiation exposure was linear – meaning that the more radiation you were exposed to, the greater the risk. They also thought that the younger the breast tissue was when exposed to radiation, the greater the chance of damaging the breast. In fact, for this reason, most experts rarely recommend a woman under 35 years of age receive a screening mammogram. Of course back then, mammograms delivered much more radiation and the pictures were much less clear than mammograms done today. Other scientists at that time believed that the small amount of radiation was not enough to pose a breast cancer risk. Yet studies from survivors of the atomic bomb and women with tuberculosis (in the days before antibiotics) who were exposed to frequent, often daily, chest x-rays for monitoring their disease did show that higher doses of radiation increased the risk of breast cancer. 

These two new studies serve to remind us that screening mammograms for young women, especially very young women at increased risk for breast cancer, for example, either because of childhood radiation or genetic inheritance of a breast cancer gene, may not be a good idea. At the very least, screening any young woman before age 35 to 40 without worrisome breast signs or symptoms with a mammogram should not be routinely done.   Although mammograms for early breast cancer detection have become a major part of women’s health care just as the Pap test is for diagnosing cervical cancer, it is always good to be reminded of the risks and the benefits of preventive health care and to question whether there are newer and smarter steps to an earlier diagnosis.  

For cervical cancer, which we now know is caused by one of 15 high risk strains of the HPV virus, doing the HPV test which checks for the high risk strains of the virus along with the Pap test for women 30 and over is thought to provide almost complete assurance that cancer or pre-cancer is not present. Yet many doctors today are still hesitant to add the HPV test because of fear women will be confused or frightened to learn they may carry a high risk strain of the virus (only 5% of women screened will test positive for the virus and many of these women have an active infection that will go away on its own within a year to two) or could lead to unnecessary follow-up testing. Most women I talk to however welcome the greater peace of mind however that a negative test result brings. An MRI scan of the breast for breast cancer screening is thought to be more sensitive than mammograms and therefore more likely to pick up subtle breast changes or early breast cancer and it is not associated with ionizing radiation. But we still do not have enough research on screening MRI’s in young high-risk women to know if they are safe, effective, and worth the greatly added cost (both dollar cost and cost to women of needless biopsies, scares, missed work, etc.). 

I suggest that until we learn more about the benefits and risks of MRI’s in young high risk women, every woman at high risk should talk with her doctor about the pros and cons of all available tests including routine mammogram, breast ultrasound, and periodic breast MRI. Every woman’s medical history and breast exam will be different and only when all aspects of a woman’s history are taken into account can the best decision for screening be made.
In addition to a detailed conversation with your practitioner about the best way to be protected, all women should:
1)      be familiar with how their breasts feel and what is normal for them - and not hesitate to report any change or concerns to their practitioner2)      have a regular breast examination by their practitioner, regardless of their risk factors3)      discuss the benefits and risks of mammograms with their practitioner and consider a yearly or biannual mammogram between the ages of 40 and 50  and 4)      have a yearly mammogram starting at age 505)      ask about getting a more sensitive digital mammogram if your breasts are very lumpy or dense. Unfortunately with the current economic crisis, too many women are delaying routine preventive care and worse yet, delaying or avoiding more urgent care as well. I fear these two new studies will do more to confuse rather than help women and will further dissuade them from getting the necessary screening tests they may need.How did you react to these two new studies about mammograms and possible risk of radiation in young women? Are you afraid to have a mammogram? Are you worried about the cost of screening tests and whether your insurance will pay for them?  

As always, I welcome your questions and comments. Dr. Marie Savard
ABC News Medical Contributor 

Dr. Savard is working on a new book, Ask Dr. Marie: Straight Talk and Reassuring Answers to Your Most Private Questions.

Her health management system is available at her website at

Go to the Ask Dr. Marie Home Page | Dr. Marie's Home Page


  1. Poltiics Says:

    Hi, I can?t understand how to add your site in my rss reader. Can you Help me, please :)

  2. Political Blog Says:

    Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds also…

  3. Political Forum Says:

    I usually don’t leave comments!!! Trust me! But I liked your blog…especially this post! Would you mind terribly if I put up a backlink from my site at to your site?

  4. WoW Goud Says:

    Very nice information. Thanks for this. I stopped to say that your blog is very well written .. :)

  5. anycleBlano Says:

    Thank you!

  6. Free Live Chat Says:

    I really liked your blog! Definely I Stumble UP the blog post ! Great Blog indeed ;)

  7. Morgan Says:

    Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again - taking you feeds also, Thanks.

  8. Sand Diego Leak Repair Says:

    I REALLY liked your post and blog! It took me a little bit to find your site…but I book marked it. Would you mind if I but a link back to my site?

  9. Ex Girlfiend Says:

    After reading this article, I feel that I really need more information on the topic. Could you suggest some more resources ?

  10. slultyunsasia Says:


  11. Arqueta Says:

    I’m glad I saw this, kudos!

  12. Wojtczak Says:

    Ohh … It seems you have done a lot of reachearch before this post .Hope you dont mind me linking this post on my website . songs

  13. Koppelman Says:

    Thanks for this post will Provide you a VIP Link on my site dans movies

  14. Badalamenti Says:

    Hey this was what i was searching for. Cool

    Bookmarked! :))


  15. Ivans Says:

    Thanks for this post will Provide you a VIP Link on my site gonzo movies

  16. Ketelhut Says:

    Completely Awesome , never seen or heard of anything
    like this blog.

    thanks for having this blog bro
    love this site

  17. Carello Loans Says:

    Hello webmaster I like your post ?.

  18. James Joyce Says:

    A most informative guide on breast cancer, thank you, it has provided me with some comfort

  19. Keeble Says:

    Yeah this is what I was looking for. ha Thanks!


  20. Lightfoot Says:

    Nice post. There’s a similar topic thats related to this in Yahoo answers or Google groups, I think. I’ll find the link and post it back here. This should spark up a good debate.

  21. Rozzi Says:

    Super site! Can’t wait to read more!

  22. Vancooten Says:

    Great blog

  23. Bierbaum Says:

    I fully agree with that, but i really don’t know if everyone could think the same. Maybe in the next future.

  24. rate mypusy Says:

    This is Great site! I am loving it!! Will come back again - taking your feeds also, Thanks.

  25. Pater Says:

    Very interesting

  26. Plass Says:

    Nice writing. You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.
    Hybrid Cars

  27. Tobia Says:

    Hello, your post is very interesting
    good and usefull information,
    thank you and very good blog…

  28. Craigo Says:

    Thanks for the interesting article

  29. western boots Says:

    Awesome info! I was honestly just thinking about something similar to this the other day… Thanks for the article!

  30. Boobs Videos Says:

    You saved me a lot of time researching for my class assignment. I am in your debt forever!

  31. Sabatino Says:

    Awesome stuff. Waiting for those exciting tips. awesome!

  32. Mabey Says:

    I just like to leave my sympathy, and give my congratulations to this blog, which is one of the best I’ver read.

  33. Hinkson Says:

    Excellent article. Being ?real? and passionate are very important. Readers can tell when the writer cares about the subject at hand. Thank you. Femme Russe

  34. Vining Says:

    Well said. I’m linking to this.

  35. Seaberry Says:

    Excellent article. Being ?real? and passionate are very important. Readers can tell when the writer cares about the subject at hand. Thank you. Femme Russe

  36. Hallford Says:

    I Love the way you write…thanks for posting

  37. Lagueux Says:

    I Love the way you write…thanks for posting

  38. Mclellan Says:

    thanks for the post…very well written.

  39. Byassee Says:

    Nice post very interesting article. I will get back to this site later to check some of other posts. Thanks!

  40. Toscani Says:

    I think the article is really interesting. I am very interested in reading more.

  41. Corona Says:

    great post i would like to know more (:

  42. Eldridge Says:

    great post i would like to know more (:

  43. Signs Of Hpv Says:

    Last Sunday, I read news about signs of hpv in newspapers. This news made me interested more in signs of hpv. And I agreed with your topic DEJA VUE: QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TIMING OF MAMMOGRAMS | Ask Dr. Marie.

  44. Degroat Says:

    interesting, I’ll try this out and report back.

  45. Cigarest Says:

    Thanks for sharing. I haven’t really had time to read it yet but I’ve bookmarked it so I can read it later.

  46. Mendel Says:

    Great post!!!

    Keep it up.

  47. Lavigna Says:

    thanks. I was woundering if you had more links on the subject…

  48. Szymkowski Says:

    Thanks for the good info.
    I was wondering if you could point me in the direction of some more recourses?.

  49. Vigrx Says:

    Thanks for sharing this information. I would like it in more detail though, feel free to e-mail me about it.

  50. Sineath Says:

    Thank you very pere this article, is among the best that I have read the Internet and tell you with full conviction that you will come again and later to elexuar and other items that are yours with great value.

  51. Porchia Says:

    Thanks for sharing the infos, i found it really useful. I’m reading you from my hotel room :) i’m on vacation here hotel

  52. Begley Says:

    Today I found this blog and are amazed by the quality of information posted here.
    Nowadays are very few blogs that offer quality of information ,we subscribed to your blog via
    RSS and we look forward the following articles

  53. John926 Says:

    Very nice site!

  54. John981 Says:

    Very nice site!

  55. Vasconcellos Says:

    I didn?t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me.

  56. Haberkorn Says:

    I would like to see more blog entries like this one

  57. Clements Says:


    Man, I gotta tell you that this article has really blown me away. I couldn’t believe when I first checked it out, highly recommended reading. Keep up the good work. Thanks for the high-quality information.


  58. John1858 Says:

    Very nice site! is it yours too

  59. John1299 Says:

    Very nice site!

  60. Amorose Says:

    Very nice site!…

  61. John1736 Says:

    Very nice site!

  62. Pharmf315 Says:

    Very nice site!

  63. Buttrum Says:

    Fantastic post, very much useful information. I found your blog a few days ago on Google and have been reading it over the past few days. I am goint to subscribe your blog. Btw, here is where you can download nhac mp3 for free

Leave a Reply